In short, mixed in Chinas Internet arena, there is no essence of these three ideas are not enough, so must always experience, in practice, continue to flourish. Incidentally also, ask Donews, liuhecai, beautiful pictures or adult information, so many to represent the essence of Chinese Internet vocabulary, how systems can not directly send it. After analysis I think Baidu is not included in a site that is completely Baidus right, even if Baidu casually clearing station, Baidu should also suffered moral condemnation rather than legal proceedings. But the incident from the other side reflects a problem that anti-cheating Baidu lost credibility and behavior, corporate responsibility Baidu has been questioned.
365 high-profile digital network announced today (July 28) charged Baidu, and now is still unknown whether the seo packages prosecution has been among this incident does not rule out entirely a speculation. But behind each news message, the behavior of 365 digital network users get a lot of support, expected by many to be cleared through the Baidu site owners who can not wait for tomorrow, court verdict against Baidu, its only happy!But calm down, objective analysis.
I think the 365 digital network is very difficult to win the lawsuit. Unless they have evidence to prove that, in front of the station was clear Baidus threats or intimidation. If you put down Baidus influence, to see it as a common sites, included not included a site entirely belong to Baidu freedom. Because Baidu is no reason to have no conditions must be included in some of the sites.
If the law is determined Baidu must be included on a single site, this case will be even more absurd. So the future is not anyones sites have all the information to the free included into it?Even if Baidu is really malicious remove some sites, we do it can only be moral condemnation, and the law is powerless.